[00:01] That's really nice! [00:15] Don't you know what JM is doing !?!? He probably made thousands of warriors that score very well against the benchmark and optimized against those warriors, so everything you make will be easy prey :) [00:16] thats what I do! [00:17] Then its ok, but JM is now probably beating the warriors that beat the benchmark warriors.. or maybe beating those already :P [00:21] holy crap gnik. [00:21] you've got a 5 frigging point lead! [00:21] you're a bad man [00:22] Nice :-D [00:22] OTOH... Ritz died.. bastards [00:24] Shame on me, I got Ritz in my benchmark, too [00:25] thats why its dead ;) [00:26] Trying to be nice, publishing my warriors.. and this is what I get in return :P [00:28] heh [00:31] Woo, my crappy evolver(tm) now spits out its first 'evolved' warriors hahaha they suck :P [00:32] lol [00:32] expect them to suck for some period between a long time and forever [00:34] Well, its mastered the art of SPL #, DJN.f #....streams.. [00:34] That's why I didn't publish my warriors yet. [00:35] gnik: Don't, only maybe if they are pushed off [00:35] mastered? [00:35] (someones high on themselves, and for a change, its not me!) [00:35] You would throw them in your sick evolvers and create some rumpelstiltmutants [00:36] no, we'd create rumpelstilt-tonite [00:50] woo 81 points on nano [00:50] lol [00:53] goodnite, have fun with rumpelstiltskin ;) [00:53] MSG: Quit: Chatzilla 0.9.77 [Firefox 2.0.0.1/2006120418] [00:53] w00t [00:53] damn. that boosted rumpel up to a 6 point lead :/ [00:55] But a new pretty high score for u2 [00:56] u2? [00:56] you too [00:56] not u2.. [00:56] ahh. [00:56] sunday bloody sunday [00:56] yes, I've got 3 in the top 5 :) [01:03] damn, that one was nice. [01:04] Close... very close [01:18] MSG: Quit: Lost terminal [02:31] MSG: Quit: Trillian (http://www.ceruleanstudios.com [07:00] MSG: [08:04] gooooood morning cw [08:05] have no idea how the soup is doing, best was 161 (met's nanobench) in the morning [09:33] Join: Roy joined #corewars [09:34] h R [09:35] Hi [10:37] Join: fiveop joined #corewars [10:59] MSG: Quit: Lost terminal [11:18] Join: Core_old joined #corewars [13:38] Join: fiveop joined #corewars [13:51] MSG: Quit: Lost terminal [14:34] this is a little bit disappointing [14:34] only 164 after ~8 hours more [14:46] Join: Core_old_ joined #corewars [14:48] MSG: Ping timeout: 255 seconds [14:52] Join: Core_old joined #corewars [14:55] MSG: Ping timeout: 255 seconds [14:58] MSG: Ping timeout: 255 seconds [14:58] "Status update. 418874810 fights already." [15:03] Join: fiveop joined #corewars [16:53] MSG: Quit: dat [17:44] what, no talks? [18:07] heya [18:12] Yace has gotten almost 20 hours of processor-time [18:13] and i have one creature in the soup above the rest, but nothing worth really mentioning =/ [18:13] i dont think the one would even reach the hill.. [18:16] 23 bvowk warriors on nano.. [18:16] we're almost halfway [18:16] they days of the humans are numbered. [18:23] 1000 million fights done by yace [18:28] raptor is submitting a storm up [18:42] w00t [18:42] rumple has been pulled off koth [19:38] Join: Fluffy joined #corewars [19:38] :) [20:01] MSG: Ping timeout: 255 seconds [20:16] Join: bvowk joined #corewars [20:16] fluffy.. what did you do to the server? [20:16] I see you sign on and smile, and then "connection reset" [20:17] My skills are unlimited! [20:17] Fear the Fluffy! [20:18] Apart from that I can only say "I didn't do it!". [20:18] I know you're lying, because if you really were that good, you would have said "Ph33r my M4d sK1llZ!" [20:19] or something equally unparseable ;) [20:19] so, I'm 1 warrior from half the hill fluffy [20:19] I would never use 1337speak! [20:19] yes, I've already noticed that [20:20] ... and I have one question [20:20] so, pheer my l33t evolver skillz ;) [20:20] about the names of your warriors [20:20] it seems to consist of 3 crc-values, right? [20:21] yup [20:21] and what exactly are you crc-ing ? [20:22] (Yes, I've started to try to decode your warriors.) [20:22] instructions-modifiers-oprands [20:22] if you start getting really good at it, I'll switch to sha-1 ;) [20:23] which means my warrior names will then be like 512 chars long ;) [20:23] as long as you'll published all 3 values, I'll have no problem with that. [20:24] there are far less possibilites for instructions that different sha-1-values [20:24] *than [20:25] indeed [20:25] of course, I could likely stick with CRC32 and pick a random extra 32bit value I'd keep secret to obfuscate ;) [20:26] or I could simply continue to send excellent warriors to the hill :) [20:26] fyi, I evolved one of your warriors the other day ;) [20:26] exactly the same? [20:27] I was stuffing the output into my nano pit and I noticed it hit one of your 69 warriors exactly. [20:27] which I thought was pretty funny [20:27] its a small nano after all huh? ;) [20:27] no, it only means that I generate warriors with far less resources than you do [20:28] Wow, nano-Koenigstuhl got tons of new warriors :) [20:33] bvowk: By the way ... which my warriors did you evolve? [20:40] I didn't look [20:40] just noted the author of the original form was you :) [20:41] Do you really check your evolved warriors against a list of all "known" warriors? [20:47] yeah [20:48] and how many hits do you usually get? [20:48] or was it the first one? [20:55] not that many actually.. [20:55] most of my warriors suck too hard ;) [20:55] but obviously you evolve enough warriors to flood the hill :) [20:55] flood? [20:56] you own 50% of the hill [20:56] I've just got enough warriors on the hill I can really easily evolve for that [20:56] yes, but that way you'll never get old warriors [20:56] because you only push off you own warriors [20:57] and we both know, that getting onto the hill is easy, but staying seems to be a problem [20:58] you've noticed I've been pushing other peoples warriors off and not mine lately right? [20:58] yes and no, I'll wait until you have a really old warrior [21:01] well, I've got one that just broke 200 [21:01] ... and Zul is about to break the 1000 :) [21:01] heh [21:02] I call that really impressive [21:06] * Fluffy waves [21:06] MSG: Quit: fluffy.i < 1, # 42 [21:06] Join: Core_old joined #corewars [21:54] Join: argiopewe joined #corewars [21:55] http://www.sudokutron.com/daily-Insane [21:55] is it just me or is that puzzle too easy today? [21:56] Howdy folks. New to codewars, and I was wondering something simple. I'm screwing with the Imp example, but if I try to mov anywhere but 1, it dies. Any particular reason this happens? [21:56] if you set it to more than 1, the next instruction is no longer mov directly infront of the previous [21:57] Hmmm, good point. I'd need to put a jmp in there, wouldn't I. [21:57] well, then you'd have a paper ;) [21:57] you'd also need a couple more processes [21:57] hehe [21:57] Really? [21:57] one for each instruction right? [21:58] so each process would move one instruction in the paper iirc [21:58] don't take my word for it however, I don't write redcode myself, I write programs to do it for me. [21:58] hehe. What sort of programs are those? [21:59] I'm an evolver, so I write programs that use genetic algorithms to make warriors [21:59] right now I'm having a good run with the nano hill ;) [21:59] I'm just barely redcode literate. [22:00] Interesting. What language do you write them in? [22:00] I've done them in perl, C, python, lisp, scheme [22:00] Nice. [22:01] I'm currently playing with a python and a lisp one in parallel.. [22:01] they're pretty much the same program, just different implementations. [22:01] Right. [22:03] Hmmm. Turns out it's hard to make self replicating code go backwards. It tends to become infinitely long. [22:04] I don't think its possible irrc [22:04] er.. iirc [22:05] It doesn't appear to be. [22:05] It's pretty easy if you don't want to self-replicate, but what's the point in that? [22:07] MSG: Quit: Lost terminal [22:07] Where is the nano hill that you're doing so well on bvowk? [22:08] sal.math.ualberta.ca [22:08] same server also has a beginner hill [22:08] you might want to give that a go [22:08] Okay, thanks. [22:11] Any suggestions on good strategies to adopt? [22:12] sorry ;) [22:12] I'm not really the person to be asking about that, as I don't write my own code.. [22:12] on the other hand, I think papers are dead sexy ;) so I'd write one of those. [22:15] :p [22:15] Guess I'll have to write one then, eh? [22:16] heh [22:16] I can't make you do anything... [22:16] just offering my suggestion. [23:12] MSG: Ping timeout: 255 seconds [23:33] Join: argiopewe joined #corewars [23:34] MSG: Client Quit