[03:24] Join: redgman joined #corewars [03:25] MSG: Client Quit [08:23] Join: fiveop joined #corewars [09:00] sascha: 146.95 [09:36] MSG: Quit: Lost terminal [10:05] Join: fiveop joined #corewars [10:57] MSG: Quit: Lost terminal [18:25] Join: willvarfa joined #corewars [18:25] evening all [18:25] hi will [19:07] Hi everybody :) [19:09] sascha: 147.01 :))) [20:17] * willvarfa waves [20:17] MSG: Remote host closed the connection [21:03] Join: fiveop joined #corewars [21:04] Hi fiveop [21:32] Join: sascha joined #corewars [21:32] Hi sascha :) [21:32] Hi Jens [23:06] Join: A-law joined #corewars [23:06] Hi A-law [23:07] hi fluffy :)> [23:07] your name somehow reminds me of gridrunner++ :) [23:08] huh? [23:08] What is gridrunner? [23:08] a funny game [23:08] at least for me .. but nm hehe [23:10] unfortunatley i made no advance in corewars yet [23:10] had no time to look into it since last time [23:10] take your time :) [23:11] the hills won't go away [23:11] hehe [23:15] wasn't there also some other, 'similar' game where you can let programs fight through virtual robots? [23:15] RoboCode [23:16] you write your own "robot" in Java [23:16] ay thanks .. but java sounds awful hehe [23:16] yup [23:17] well .. actually no, but it is just too verbose [23:20] hmm well it's relatively clean and i understand why it's an quasi industry standard, but i'm missing paradigms like messages(typechecked) on the other hand i'm no programming guru/missing experience [23:21] It only miss, that I have to type less ;) [23:22] well there's E, but there's not much development with that language [23:22] type less than where? [23:22] C? [23:22] Python [23:22] Perl [23:23] Ruby [23:23] even less than PHP [23:23] hmmmm [23:26] what should i try next ruby or python? =) [23:26] I prefer Python, but there isn't much difference ;) [23:26] Both are really nice, easy and powerful languages [23:29] haven't been very happy with perl & java. imho perl for scripting is ok, and java if you want to be rather platform independent [23:30] python seems to have more supporters [23:30] yes, probably [23:32] and it's part of the name of a great comedian group .. so for that rational reason i shall try it first hehe [23:32] Have fun! [23:33] thanks, but for now i'll try corewars hehe [23:33] brb [23:53] is there something like an ADD.I, i.e. writing to the instruction field? [23:53] no [23:53] because there is no simple way to define additon on opcodes [23:58] well you could just add the a field to the instruction code, but that would require that the opcodes are well-defined [23:58] but that would be no obvious solution [23:59] indeed it wouldn't be consistent [23:59] well nm thanks for your help again ;) i promis to pop up with other stupid questions hehe