[01:06] Join: Nol joined #corewars [01:59] Join: KOTH joined #corewars [01:59] Part: KOTH left #corewars [02:54] Join: Caelian__ joined #corewars [02:58] MSG: Ping timeout: 252 seconds [02:58] This channe is most definately too dead. [04:14] Join: Metcalf joined #corewars [04:14] Hi :-) [04:15] MSG: Ping timeout: 252 seconds [04:16] Join: Caelian|w joined #corewars [04:17] * Metcalf wonders about Nol [04:17] MSG: Client Quit [04:18] Gah [04:19] He could have stayed on for >3 minutes [05:45] MSG: Quit: Ex-Chat [05:46] Join: Caelian joined #corewars [05:47] MSG: Client Quit [05:50] Join: Caelian joined #corewars [05:52] MSG: Client Quit [05:54] Join: Caelian joined #corewars [08:15] Nol: well, it seems that people havent been able to return back to CW after the last summer [09:27] Join: fiveop joined #corewars [10:08] MSG: Quit: Lost terminal [14:00] :) [14:00] Anybody alive? [15:43] MSG: Quit: Ex-Chat [15:44] Join: Caelian|w joined #corewars [16:58] Join: fiveop joined #corewars [17:06] Join: Core_new_ joined #corewars [17:24] MSG: Ping timeout: 252 seconds [17:24] Join: Core_new_ joined #corewars [17:42] Join: Fizmo joined #corewars [17:42] hi hi [17:42] :) [17:42] :-P [17:43] Hi Fluffy, what a surprise ;-) [17:43] lol [17:49] anybody else not afk? [17:51] Join: raptor joined #corewars [17:51] me [17:51] for about a few seconds [17:52] Hey Fiveop [17:53] :) [17:54] Hi Fluffy [17:55] Is anybody working on a new warrior? [17:55] It is kind of depressind to wait for successful challenges on '94nop [17:57] * raptor works on a tiny warrior [17:58] :) [17:58] hey raptor [17:59] nice [17:59] what kind of strategy you're trying? [17:59] Hi Fizmo [17:59] hybrid [18:00] hybrid? [18:00] sounds interesting [18:01] what are you guys up to [18:01] * Fluffy is generating warriors for nano [18:03] hmm, not much yet [18:03] still on business travel so far [18:03] just get bored in hotel [18:04] but usually I do something for the 94nop and 94draft [18:04] more seldom for the other hills [18:09] I don't find the bigger hills much fun [18:11] Too hard? [18:12] I haven't submitted anything recently because hotmail changed [18:12] ohh? [18:12] you never tried the beginner hill? [18:12] shouldn't be that hard to enter [18:14] am I a beginner? [18:14] hmm, honestly, I don't know [18:15] at least I didn't recognized you on a hill so far :-S [18:15] That depends on the hill :) I'm a beginner on all P-space-hills! [18:15] hehehe :-P [18:15] you should try to work on a nice p-warrior [18:15] I've had a hall of fame nano warrior [18:15] ;-) [18:16] ohh, woooow [18:16] ? [18:16] well, I justhad some few nano warriors right in the beginning of the hill [18:17] :) [18:19] but pushed off quickly [18:19] My first one was a nano warrior [18:19] on the hill [18:19] for about 2? challenges if that :P [18:19] hehe [18:19] :-P [18:19] hi fiveop [18:21] that one little fluffy warrior falling off the hill [18:22] http://sal.math.ualberta.ca/warrior.php?key=nano&id=65 [18:22] http://sal.math.ualberta.ca/warrior.php?key=nano&id=64 [18:22] raptor: Eeeek! [18:23] Fortunately my current generator run will have a new one ready in a couple of hours [18:24] ;-) [18:31] what is left alone? [18:32] spl/mov/mov/mov/mov without an imp [18:32] I can only find three publish nano warriors [18:32] that are on the hill [18:33] Apart from White Moon I'm willing to publish any of my other nano warriors [18:33] Just choose one :) [18:35] left alone? [18:36] ok, give me 5 mins :) [18:37] :-P [18:38] yay! [18:40] Done! Should appear in a couple of seconds on rgc [18:43] thanks [18:44] No problem :) I still have tons of nano warriors [18:47] my scores average at 130 [18:47] against the hill? a benchmark? [18:49] hill [18:59] when will we get a new nanowarrior issue [19:00] no idea [19:08] Peoples? [19:09] where? [19:09] Bananas? [19:09] Pizza? [19:09] So, I'm new to corewars [19:11] Well ... if you have questions ... [19:11] here might be the right place :) [19:11] Heh, I think I'm off to a good start, submitted by first warrior to the beginner hill and got third [19:12] Congrats! [19:13] Ithen submitted it to the 94nop hill to get a comparative picture of how much it stucked [19:13] *sucked [19:14] So I figure until I put up something that hits first on the biginner hill, may as well stay there. [19:14] That's normal. Soons you'll have better warriors [19:14] 3.416 km in under 19:33, i.e. with an average speed of at least 10.48 km/h \o/ [19:15] bicycle? [19:15] ;) [19:15] Yeah, what I made was an .80c scanner using a variable-length SPL carpet (So basicly HSA style) ending in a d-clear [19:15] Also, nmars may work on linux on mono, But I cant seem to get it working, probably because I'm running 64 bit [19:16] Fluffy: no :/ [19:18] Nol: Your score on '94nop suggests that you either have a bug or your scan isn't long enough [19:20] Yeah, I'm going to see if I can get a better insight into whats going on via nmars...I've noticed some stuff go awry in pmars at least [19:21] do they compile stuff different [19:21] I've never worked with nmars. [19:21] If you can you should use pmars, because it is the quasi-standard [19:22] I go to bed now [19:23] * Fizmo waves [19:23] cye [19:23] cya [19:23] MSG: Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.78.1 [Firefox 2.0.0.7/2007091417] [19:23] * Fluffy waves [19:23] ... too late [19:24] all mars should be compatible [19:24] yes, but that's kind of difficult [19:24] but usually they are [19:24] and everybody at least *tries* to be compatible with pmars [19:25] Is there any way to slow down pmars (Not counting debugging) [19:26] you can use it in debug mode [19:26] pmars -e w1.red [19:26] I just said not counting debugging [19:27] -v something? [19:27] -v? [19:27] A way to get a good general visual on the execution without running under debugging [19:27] Do you use Windows? [19:27] no, gentoo linux [19:28] hmm ... then you have to stick with pmars [19:29] What exactly are you trying to do? [19:30] nah, nevermind, I'm fine [19:30] :) [19:31] Part of the reason the 94nop scores sucked, I think, is this things large memory footprint [19:31] You can always publish you warrior to rgc and yell for help :) [19:31] *your [19:32] The change from '94b to '94nop is quite large. '94nop contains hightly optimized warriors [19:32] *highly [19:34] Yeah, no kidding. I expected that. I just wanted to see about how much it sucked :P [19:35] 94nop is getting so good is hard to get through even with experience [19:35] You can always try to benchmark your warrior against one of the published benchmarks [19:35] especially if one considers overoptimization bad [19:35] Mizcu: Sascha and I have optimized only for 6 months or so ;) [19:36] Out of curiosity, whats the 94x hill like? [19:36] Different [19:37] At least I couldn't use my knowledge from '94nop on '94x [19:38] I'd expect that it would more or less completely ineffectuate qscanners [19:38] yes, probably [19:40] Ha, yeah optimax for not having 64-bit support, way to lazy to hack that. [19:43] MSG: Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.78.1 [Firefox 2.0.0.7/2007091417] [20:01] MSG: Quit: Trillian (http://www.ceruleanstudios.com [20:52] MSG: Quit: humhum [21:01] Join: Metcalf joined #corewars [21:01] Hi :-) [21:02] Anyone have problems with multi-line equates? [21:10] * Metcalf summons bvowk [21:15] MSG: Read error: Operation timed out [21:25] Hmm... [21:25] Joonas has has a similar problem with multi-line equ :-( [21:25] * Metcalf waves [21:26] MSG: Quit: mov.i #1,1